Become a Partner Get in Touch
SG Instruments Private Limited
search
Contact
Banner
Calendar 08 Sep 2025

Summarized Infographic: Bionavis MP-SPR vs. Traditional SPR

 

Feature Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Optical Setup Multi-angle & multi-wavelength Single-angle & single-wavelength
Data Output Binding kinetics + layer thickness + RI Binding kinetics only
Sensitivity (RIU) ~10-5 to 10-8 ~10-7 (higher sensitivity)
Multilayer Modeling Yes No
Sample Types Biomolecules, cells, exosomes, membranes Mainly purified biomolecules
Structural Info Yes (thickness, swelling, conformation) No
Typical Applications Material science, exosomes, membranes Drug discovery, antibody screening
Throughput Moderate High (automation available)

Detailed Application Guide: Choosing Between Bionavis MP-SPR & Traditional SPR

  1. Drug Discovery & Screening
  • Traditional SPR
  1. Industry standard for screening small molecules, antibodies, and peptides.
  2. High sensitivity (RI change ~10⁻⁷), ideal for detecting low molecular weight compounds.
  3. Supports high-throughput automation for large compound libraries.
  4. Limited to purified biomolecules.
  • Bionavis MP-SPR
  1. Can perform binding kinetics but less sensitive for small molecules.
  2. Useful when additional structural information is needed during screening.
  3. Lower throughput compared to traditional SPR.

Recommendation: Use Traditional SPR for routine high-throughput drug screening.

2. Biomaterial & Surface Coating Characterization

  • Bionavis MP-SPR
  1. Excels at measuring thickness and refractive index of biomaterial coatings.
  2. Supports multilayer analysis and conformational changes (e.g., swelling).
  3. Ideal for polymers, hydrogels, and nanoparticle coatings.
  • Traditional SPR
  1. Cannot differentiate layer thickness or structural changes.
  2. Limited to measuring binding events.

Recommendation: Use Bionavis MP-SPR for detailed surface and material characterization.

3. Nanoparticle & Exosome Research

  • Bionavis MP-SPR
  1. Measures size, protein corona formation, and binding kinetics on exosomes and nanoparticles.
  2. Provides label-free thickness and refractive index data.
  3. Supports analysis in complex media and biological fluids.
  • Traditional SPR
  1. Can measure binding but no structural or thickness information.
  2. Less suited for heterogeneous or complex samples.

Recommendation: Use Bionavis MP-SPR for comprehensive exosome and nanoparticle studies.

4. Cell Interaction & Membrane Studies

  • Bionavis MP-SPR
  1. Supports live cell and lipid bilayer assays on sensor surfaces.
  2. Measures real-time interactions without labels.
  3. Captures conformational changes during interaction.
  • Traditional SPR
  1. Limited compatibility with cells.
  2. Mostly used with purified proteins.

Recommendation: Use Bionavis MP-SPR for cell-based assays and membrane interaction studies.

5. Kinetics & Affinity Studies

  • Both Systems
  1. Provide real-time kinetic analysis (association/dissociation rates, affinity constants).
  2. Suitable for protein-protein and protein-ligand interaction studies.
  • Traditional SPR
  1. Superior sensitivity for low molecular weight analytes.
  2. Widely validated and supported in pharmaceutical research.
  • Bionavis MP-SPR
  1. Offers additional parameters alongside kinetics.
  2. Better for complex or multilayer systems.

Summary Table: Application Focus

Application Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Small molecule drug screening Moderate Excellent
Protein-protein kinetics Excellent Excellent
Biomaterial layer analysis Excellent Poor
Nanoparticle/exosome studies Excellent Limited
Cell interaction studies Supported Limited
High-throughput screening Limited Excellent

Technical Comparison: Bionavis MP-SPR vs. Traditional SPR

1. Fundamental Operating Principles

Application Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Small molecule drug screening Moderate Excellent
Protein-protein kinetics Excellent Excellent
Biomaterial layer analysis Excellent Poor
Nanoparticle/exosome studies Excellent Limited
Cell interaction studies Supported Limited
High-throughput screening Limited Excellent

Summary:

Bionavis MP-SPR collects more comprehensive optical data by scanning SPR angular spectra over several wavelengths, while traditional SPR captures a single intensity shift at a fixed angle.

2. Measurement Capabilities

Parameter Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Binding Kinetics (ka, kd, KD) Yes Yes
Molecular Layer Thickness Yes, quantitative (0.5–1000 nm range) No, qualitative only
Refractive Index Sensitivity Moderate (~10-5 to 10-8 RIU) High (~10-7 RIU), excellent for small molecules
Multilayer Modeling Yes, can deconvolute multilayers No, only bulk refractive index changes
Structural Changes Monitoring Yes, conformational and swelling changes No

Summary:

MP-SPR excels at characterizing complex, multilayered or structural changes in biomaterials, whereas traditional SPR offers higher sensitivity for detecting very low mass changes.

3. Data Analysis & Outputs

Feature Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Raw Data Full angular reflectivity curves at multiple wavelengths Single SPR angle/intensity shifts
Output Parameters Thickness, refractive index, mass, kinetics Response units correlating with mass bound
Layer Composition Insights Possible through optical modeling Not possible
Visualization 3D spectral-angular plots 2D sensorgram curves

Summary:

MP-SPR provides richer datasets enabling deeper insights into sample composition and structural properties, beyond just binding kinetics.

4. Instrumentation & Flexibility

Feature Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Sensor Surface Flexibility Highly customizable (gold, graphene, TiO₂, glass) Typically gold-coated glass, limited variants
Sample Types Biomolecules, nanoparticles, cells, membranes Mostly biomolecules and purified samples
Cell-based Assays Supported (cells grown on sensor surface) Limited compatibility
Multiparametric Measurements Yes No

Summary:

Bionavis MP-SPR’s open architecture supports diverse materials and complex biological interfaces, while traditional SPR is optimized mainly for purified molecular interactions.

5. Applications

Application Area Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Drug Discovery (small molecule) Possible but less sensitive Industry standard, highly sensitive
Biomolecular Interaction Studies Yes Yes
Nanoparticle & Exosome Research Excellent (layer thickness, corona) Limited (only bulk binding)
Biomaterial Characterization Yes (surface coatings, swelling) No
Cell Interaction Studies Supported Limited

6. Advantages & Limitations

Aspect Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Advantages
  • Multiparametric: thickness, refractive index, kinetics
  • Suitable for complex, multilayer systems
  • Compatible with cells and nanoparticles
  • Rich data for structural insights
  • Extremely sensitive to low molecular weight analytes
  • Established in pharmaceutical and biosensing fields
  • High throughput and automation available
Limitations
  • Moderate refractive index sensitivity
  • More complex data analysis
  • Lower throughput compared to automated traditional SPR
  • Limited information to refractive index changes
  • Cannot resolve layer thickness or conformational changes
  • Limited to purified biomolecular systems

7. Summary Table

Feature Bionavis MP-SPR Traditional SPR
Optical Configuration Multi-angle, multi-wavelength Single-angle, single-wavelength
Data Output Thickness, RI, kinetics, structure Binding kinetics only
Sensitivity (RIU) ~10-5 to 10-6 ~10-7
Multilayer Modeling Yes No
Sample Compatibility Cells, nanoparticles, membranes Purified biomolecules
Typical Applications Material science, exosomes, membranes Drug discovery, antibody screening
Throughput Moderate High (automation available)

Conclusion

  • Bionavis MP-SPR is ideal for researchers needing multiparametric analysis of complex biological systems, such as exosomes, biomaterial coatings, and cell interactions. Its ability to provide layer thickness and refractive index information in addition to kinetics makes it uniquely powerful for structural studies.
  • Traditional SPR remains the gold standard for highly sensitive, real-time kinetic studies of biomolecular interactions, especially in drug discovery and antibody development. Its simpler data and higher throughput suit routine screening tasks.

Choosing between them depends on your research focus: if you require rich, multilayer structural information beyond binding kinetics, Bionavis MP-SPR is the better choice; if your priority is sensitive detection of small molecules and robust kinetic assays, traditional SPR platforms excel.